| on 29-04-2008 17:20 |
| Editor's rating |
 |
|
| Views |
468  |
|
|
|
Lord Rees thinks the UK should focus attention on unmanned spaceflight
|
Maggie Shiels
BBC News, San Francisco
|
Nasa has a budget this year of more than $17bn (£9bn; 11bn
euros), in contrast to the UK's annual civil space budget of £220m
($430m; 270m euros) and the European Space Agency's (Esa) expenditure
of 3bn euros (£2.5bn; $5bn).
Steal a march
Speaking to the BBC during a week-long trip to California to
promote the Royal Society, Lord Rees said manned missions were largely
irrelevant.
These days, no-one gets excited in the way they once did over the early Apollo programme, he added.
"The space shuttle only really makes headlines when there has
been a disaster," he said. "Routine shuttle launchings don't make
headlines.
"What actually makes the newspaper headlines are the marvellous
pictures from the Hubble telescope and those of the surface of Mars and
Jupiter and Titan, all obtained robotically."
Lord Rees, the professor of Cosmology and Astrophysics at
Cambridge's Institute of Astronomy, said the unmanned part of Nasa's
project was - like Europe's - hugely successful.
This, he said, was where the UK should concentrate its energies.
"If I was an American, I would be opposed to a return to the Moon and going to Mars," he said.
Differing views
"We in Europe should try and get a world lead in space
exploration and applications," said the Royal Society president, who
also holds the position of English Astronomer Royal.
"Manned missions are hugely more expensive and the practical
case for sending people weakens with every advance in robotics and
miniaturisation."
Despite his views, though, Europe is pursuing a vigorous human
spaceflight policy and has so far spent 5bn euros ($8bn; £4bn) on the
space station.
Just last week, Esa unveiled a campaign to recruit the European astronauts of tomorrow.
Britain has also hinted at a change in its long-standing
opposition to human space activities following several high-profile
reports.
One, a specially convened government advisory panel, suggested the UK's
policy has damaged the country both scientifically and economically.
Space budget
While the notion of a Briton in space could be inspirational for
young people, it could also present all sorts of opportunities for
business.
In the past, British companies have been denied the chance to bid for
high-profile contracts in the human spaceflight arena. That looks set
to change.
But Lord Rees remains adamant there is only one path to take and that
the UK and Europe are wasting time trying to best the US or Russia in
human spaceflight.
"For historical reasons connected with superpower rivalry,
space is one of the arenas where America and Russia have a bigger
budget for space than Western Europe," he said.
"Whereas in everything else, Western Europe is fully a match
for the US. We can be more effective in space if we focus all our
budget on miniaturisation, robotics, and fabricators and avoid manned
spaceflight."
Recommend this article... Last update: 29-04-2008 17:24
Users' Comments (0)
|
|
|